As I prepared to go to Nepal, for what would be the
first of my world travels I was asked to read this essay and write a response. At the time, I think that I just made something up
(forgive me, instructors!), and I don’t have my response anymore. The question
has returned to me with a vengeance lately, though, as I find myself in
Southeast Asia with some free time and no plans.
I’m ridiculously fortunate to have the means to
travel essentially anywhere in this region that I choose, and it’s important to
acknowledge that. My issue is that I’ve caught myself several times looking at
flights to countries that I know nothing about, and am not particularly
interested in, just because I can go
there, to tick another box on my travel list, and that bothers me. There are
loads of equally privileged people around here who are just going on the
‘tourist circuit’, who never connect with local people or their cultures,
barely eat any local food, and party with other foreigners every night. I
really don’t want to be like that.
So, why do I travel? Is it just to see new things? No, there are plenty of countries
full of new things that I have no interest in seeing whatsoever. Is it just to tick boxes on a list of
countries? No, I’ve felt unfulfilled during my few bouts of aimless
independent travel, even in countries that I like. Is it just for work? No, I could probably find work at home. Is it for the food? Yes, but sadly I can
only spend a portion of each day eating. I think that it’s a combination of
things. My best travel experiences have consistently had these qualities:
- I can talk to people. For me, this applies wherever English is prevalent, and in places where there are lots of Nepali people. Malaysia scores well in this category.
- I have a companion to share the experience with. I’ve been fortunate enough to share most of the past few months on the road with dear friends, which has brightened my experience regardless of place.
- I have a strong interest in the religion, culture, and history of the place. This largely includes places in the Indic sphere and places where Buddhism is still alive. This also largely excludes major tourist sites such as the main temples of Angkor Wat, the remnants of which are daily trodden upon by the unwashed masses.
- I’m going for work. I love my job, my coworkers, and my students. I have had a fantastic time everywhere that my work takes me, even in some places that I would otherwise not have enjoyed nearly as much.
- Good food. Duh.
- Cultural engagement, through communication and the drive of my personal interest. And food.
- Companionship, both with local people and fellow travelers.
- Having some purpose, either in work or the pursuit of knowledge and personal growth.
This fits rather well with my fanatical love for
Nepal, as all of my criteria are satisfied everywhere in that country. It also
explains my surprise love for Malaysia, a country that I had never imagined
visiting before my job took me there, and in which I have now spent more time
than in any other country after the US and Nepal.
Now, following my criteria, I should first travel
to wherever my work takes me, which right now is nowhere. After that, I should
go to places that I find very interesting, whether they’re new or not. So, what
should I do with a period of not-work, during which I need to move around every
so often to avoid overstaying visas? Should
I go to Laos just because it’s nearby, even though I don’t know the first thing
about Laos? Not without first doing enough research to determine my
interest level and knowing enough to engage with some of what I might see there.
But you might love it anyway, and you shouldn’t
miss the opportunity! Thanks, Travel FOMO, but I’m having a great time
right where I am.
I’m concluding that for me, at least right now,
the best thing to do is to revisit places that I would like to connect with
more deeply, and to explore new places as the opportunities and interest arise.
There’s something appealing about trying to visit as many countries as possible,
but that approach to travel doesn’t suit me. Is ‘because I can’ a legitimate
reason to visit a new country? I don’t know, but I think this happens a lot,
and the results can be unsavory. I would rather know a few places very well
than many places superficially. I suppose it’s like making friends. Quality
over quantity.
Now back to the
question at hand. One of the paramount reasons that I always come back to is
that travel brings light and novelty into even the simplest mundane tasks.
Grabbing a coffee in Boston doesn’t strike one as being a particularly
memorable experience (or perhaps a negative one, depending on where you go),
but grabbing a coffee in Bagan, Bangkok, or Battambang can be hilarious,
frustrating, and confusing all at once, in the best way. The great beauty of it
is that the novelty extends back to Boston, upon returning home, having
shattered assumptions and routine.
I am continually blown
away by the fact that I can speak to people in another language, and that for
most people in the world this is completely normal. The journey of learning and
using a new language, a different kind of travel, cultivates the humility that
comes with knowingly speaking like a child and saying things incorrectly, while
simultaneously opening doors otherwise closed to outsiders, both physical and,
more significantly, mental and emotional. To reach a level of fluency which
allows one to hear the depth and poetry of others who, when speaking our
language, may sound simple, creates so much new wonder and reverence. And to begin
expressing thoughts that cannot be articulated in English is an experience of
truly broadening the aperture of the mind.
Can we take a selfie, please?
Yes, five-hundred kyat